Measuring What Matters: How to Know If Your Mental Health Program Works

Oct 13

Employers spend millions each year on mental health benefits. But how do you know if those programs are actually working?

Burnout and absenteeism are climbing. Disability claims tied to depression and anxiety keep rising. Yet most HR and benefits leaders are still being asked to justify budgets with nothing more than access numbers or utilization reports.

Here’s the problem: access is important, but it doesn’t prove impact. True value in mental health comes from something deeper: helping people feel better, function better, and stay better over time.

That’s why a new approach to measurement is needed.

You Can’t Manage What You Don’t Measure

Too often, organizations renew contracts with mental health vendors without a clear picture of whether employees are actually improving. Utilization data might show that people logged into an app or scheduled a session. But did their stress, anxiety, or depression symptoms actually go down? Did their day-to-day functioning improve?

If you can’t answer those questions, you can’t prove ROI. More importantly, you can’t improve care quality. Mental health benefits shouldn’t be a black box. They should be accountable, transparent, and trackable.

The Problem with “Utilization” Metrics

For years, utilization has been the go-to metric in behavioral health. It’s simple to count: how many people signed up, how many sessions were scheduled, or how many minutes were logged.

But utilization is not the same as outcomes. Here’s why:

High utilization doesn’t guarantee improvement. People might attend sessions, but if their symptoms aren’t tracked, you don’t know if those sessions are working.
Low utilization doesn’t mean lack of need. EAPs often report less than 5% engagement. That doesn’t mean 95% of employees are fine. It means the program isn’t resonating or accessible.
Utilization is easy to inflate. Vendors can count logins, downloads, or any interaction as “engagement,” even if employees drop off after one use.

When the only metric on the table is utilization, HR leaders and finance stakeholders are left guessing.

What Real Outcomes Look Like in Mental Health

So what should you measure instead?

Real outcomes in mental health go beyond access. They focus on changes that matter in people’s lives and the workplace. That includes:

Symptom reduction: Are depression or anxiety scores going down over time?
Functional gains: Are employees reporting better focus, productivity, and energy at work?
Sustained improvement: Do benefits last beyond the first few weeks of engagement?
Satisfaction and experience: Are members reporting that care is helpful, relevant, and personalized?

These measures aren’t theoretical. They’re trackable with validated tools like the DASS-21 or PHQ and GAD scales. The key is frequency. If measurement only happens once or twice a year through a survey, you’re not capturing real-world change.

Why Measurement Matters for Equity, Quality, and ROI

Measurement is more than an operational checkbox. It’s central to accountability, equity, and business value.

Equity: Without measurement, it’s impossible to know if certain groups (such as caregivers, employees of color, or those managing chronic conditions) are being supported effectively. Measurement shines a light on gaps and helps close them.
Quality: Clinicians and coaches can’t refine care without feedback. Real-time symptom tracking allows programs to adjust when someone isn’t improving.
ROI: CFOs and finance teams need proof that mental health spend translates into reduced absenteeism, higher retention, and lower claims. Without outcomes, ROI is a guess.

Think about it: no one would accept a diabetes program that only reported how many people showed up to an appointment. Employers demand A1C improvement data. Mental health should be held to the same standard.

How Wave Measures What Matters

Wave was built as a measurement-based care platform from the start. Every employee’s experience is tracked and optimized in real time.

Here’s how it works:

Structured symptom tracking
Members complete validated assessments like the DASS-21 regularly. Progress is visible to both the coach and the member.
Coach-logged session insights
Every interaction is documented. AI-assisted tools flag trends, risks, and opportunities for personalization.
Recommengine and AI support
Our adaptive engine delivers the right skills and digital resources between sessions. Progress is monitored, and recommendations adjust as needs change.
Population-level outcomes
Employers and health plans can get transparent reporting that ties symptom reduction to engagement, absenteeism, and modeled savings.

The result: 70 to 73% of Wave members improve within weeks. Anxiety and depression symptoms are reduced by up to 50%, even in severe cases. Engagement rates are five times the industry average.

That’s measurable impact you can take to your CFO.

Questions to Ask Your Mental Health Vendor

If you’re evaluating or renewing a mental health benefit, don’t stop at glossy marketing claims or surface-level metrics. The right questions can reveal whether a vendor is truly delivering meaningful outcomes or simply reporting activity. Here are five that cut through the noise:

1. How do you define success?
If the answer is “utilization,” dig deeper. Utilization only shows who accessed the program, not whether they got better. True success should be measured in clinical outcomes like symptom reduction, functional improvements, and long-term engagement. A strong partner will define success the same way you do: employees who feel better and stay better, and organizations that see measurable ROI.

2. What validated tools do you use to measure improvement?
Many vendors rely on homegrown surveys or one-off feedback forms. Those might capture satisfaction, but they don’t prove clinical impact. Look for evidence-based tools like the DASS-21, PHQ, or GAD, which are validated to track changes in depression, anxiety, and stress. These tools provide standardized data that can be benchmarked and trusted.

3. How often do you measure outcomes?
Collecting data once a year isn’t enough. Mental health is dynamic, and employee needs shift week to week. Real-time or frequent measurement allows providers to adjust care if someone isn’t improving and gives employers timely visibility into program effectiveness. Ask whether your vendor has built measurement into the care process itself, not just as an annual afterthought.

4. Do you report outcomes transparently at the population level?
It’s not enough for a vendor to say “people are improving.” You should be able to see aggregate data across your workforce, broken down by relevant segments like geography, role type, or tenure. Transparent reporting helps you identify which groups are benefiting and where gaps may exist. Without this level of visibility, you can’t hold a vendor accountable or ensure equity across your employee base.

5. Can you tie outcomes to ROI?
The best partners connect clinical improvement to business outcomes. That means linking symptom reduction to lower absenteeism, higher retention, and reduced claims. Look for vendors that can model savings or provide case studies that demonstrate financial impact. If a vendor can’t draw a clear line from outcomes to ROI, your investment is essentially blind.

If a vendor can’t answer these questions clearly, it’s a red flag. A credible partner will welcome these questions, because they’ll have the data to back up their answers.

Why It Matters Now

The stakes have never been higher. Mental health is one of the top drivers of healthcare spend, and the pressure on HR leaders to deliver ROI is only growing. At the same time, employees are demanding benefits that actually work, not just check a box.

Investing in programs that can’t prove outcomes is a missed opportunity. Employers that demand measurement-based care will not only deliver better support to employees, they’ll also see stronger financial returns.

This is the future of mental health benefits: accountable, measurable, and effective at scale.

FAQ

Isn’t access the most important first step?
Yes, access matters. But access without improvement is wasted spend. Programs need to deliver both access and outcomes.

What’s the difference between measurement-based care and surveys?
Measurement-based care uses validated clinical tools on a recurring basis. Surveys capture opinions. Both are useful, but only validated measures prove clinical impact.

How quickly should we expect to see improvement?
At Wave, 70 to 73% of members improve within 8 weeks. That’s a timeframe employers can track and use to evaluate ROI.

Does measurement create extra work for employees?
No. Wave integrates short, clinically validated check-ins seamlessly into the experience. They’re fast, easy, and directly tied to care.

Ready to Measure What Matters?

🌊 Mental health programs should be held to the same standard as any other healthcare benefit. If you can’t measure it, you can’t prove it works.

👉 Want to know if your current program is really working? See how Wave delivers measurable mental health outcomes: Book a demo.

Wave Life